QFIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of --. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $52.77, signalling upside risk potential of 10.42%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qifu Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.05x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.65x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FinVolution Group has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 19.04%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat FinVolution Group's return on equity of 15.74%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $52.77, signalling upside risk potential of 10.42%. On the other hand FinVolution Group has an analysts' consensus of $8.65 which suggests that it could fall by -19.29%. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than FinVolution Group, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than FinVolution Group.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.176%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. FinVolution Group offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Qifu Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than FinVolution Group quarterly revenues of $457.6M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than FinVolution Group's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.05x while FinVolution Group's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.65x versus 1.60x for FinVolution Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 8.45%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $52.77, signalling upside risk potential of 10.42%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could fall by -40.34%. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than LexinFintech Holdings.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.594, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.551%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Qifu Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $511.5M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.05x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 16.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.65x versus 0.91x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 52.32% compared to Qifu Technology's net margin of 17.57%. Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Qifu Technology has a consensus price target of $52.77, signalling upside risk potential of 10.42%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $9.76 which suggests that it could fall by -14.29%. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding.

Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.005%.

Qifu Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qifu Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qifu Technology quarterly revenues are $509.1M, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Qifu Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.05x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 53.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qifu Technology is 3.65x versus 4.64x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.